Comments on: Ad Networks, Vertical Ad Networks, and Affiliate Networks by Peter Figueredo http://feedfront.com/archives/article001396 FeedFront Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: MediaTrust http://feedfront.com/archives/article001396/comment-page-1#comment-57 MediaTrust Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:03:39 +0000 http://feedfront.com/?p=1396#comment-57 Peter<br>great post and insight. I could not agree more. i think some one needs to write a post called "die network die". not only are there to many network. but the word network alone needs to evolve with innovation. network seems so one dimensional in comparison to where the world of media advertising and technology is heading. We are moving into the world of open modular platforms that are agnostic , 3 dimensional and highly scalable. <br><br>Our new systems that we have been building for the last 2 years are all integrated into a performance marketing platform. the network will be a layer on the platform. we are going to move away from our Advaliant affiliate marketing division being called a affiliate network. Peter
great post and insight. I could not agree more. i think some one needs to write a post called “die network die”. not only are there to many network. but the word network alone needs to evolve with innovation. network seems so one dimensional in comparison to where the world of media advertising and technology is heading. We are moving into the world of open modular platforms that are agnostic , 3 dimensional and highly scalable.

Our new systems that we have been building for the last 2 years are all integrated into a performance marketing platform. the network will be a layer on the platform. we are going to move away from our Advaliant affiliate marketing division being called a affiliate network.

]]> By: MediaTrust http://feedfront.com/archives/article001396/comment-page-1#comment-48 MediaTrust Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:03:39 +0000 http://feedfront.com/?p=1396#comment-48 Peter<br>great post and insight. I could not agree more. i think some one needs to write a post called "die network die". not only are there to many network. but the word network alone needs to evolve with innovation. network seems so one dimensional in comparison to where the world of media advertising and technology is heading. We are moving into the world of open modular platforms that are agnostic , 3 dimensional and highly scalable. <br><br>Our new systems that we have been building for the last 2 years are all integrated into a performance marketing platform. the network will be a layer on the platform. we are going to move away from our Advaliant affiliate marketing division being called a affiliate network. Peter
great post and insight. I could not agree more. i think some one needs to write a post called “die network die”. not only are there to many network. but the word network alone needs to evolve with innovation. network seems so one dimensional in comparison to where the world of media advertising and technology is heading. We are moving into the world of open modular platforms that are agnostic , 3 dimensional and highly scalable.

Our new systems that we have been building for the last 2 years are all integrated into a performance marketing platform. the network will be a layer on the platform. we are going to move away from our Advaliant affiliate marketing division being called a affiliate network.

]]> By: Peter Figueredo http://feedfront.com/archives/article001396/comment-page-1#comment-47 Peter Figueredo Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:30:28 +0000 http://feedfront.com/?p=1396#comment-47 Thanks for posting this comment Shawn and thanks for the opportunity to be a part of FeedFront Issue #1<br><br>The "never required" note was referring to publishers, not advertisers. None of the major affiliate technology platforms (CJ, LinkShare, Performics, ShareASale, etc) require publisher exclusivity. <br><br>However, It is true that LinkShare still requires exclusivity of its advertisers. <br><br>I tried to make this clear by seperating the sections by value to publishers and value to advertisers but i see that I could have done a better job. <br><br>Thanks for the feedback Thanks for posting this comment Shawn and thanks for the opportunity to be a part of FeedFront Issue #1

The “never required” note was referring to publishers, not advertisers. None of the major affiliate technology platforms (CJ, LinkShare, Performics, ShareASale, etc) require publisher exclusivity.

However, It is true that LinkShare still requires exclusivity of its advertisers.

I tried to make this clear by seperating the sections by value to publishers and value to advertisers but i see that I could have done a better job.

Thanks for the feedback

]]> By: Shawn Collins http://feedfront.com/archives/article001396/comment-page-1#comment-46 Shawn Collins Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:12:19 +0000 http://feedfront.com/?p=1396#comment-46 We received the following feedback to this article...<br><br><blockquote>On page 31 of the magazine, isn't Linkshare an exclusive network and they are quite a big dog on the block. According to the table, it says "Never Required".<br> <br>I know they were open to negotiation on exclusivity years ago when I approached them. Is it all gone now?</blockquote> We received the following feedback to this article…

On page 31 of the magazine, isn't Linkshare an exclusive network and they are quite a big dog on the block. According to the table, it says “Never Required”.

I know they were open to negotiation on exclusivity years ago when I approached them. Is it all gone now?

]]>